In a March 24 article, I explained that Panini's MASKS trademark application was published for opposition, and subtly hinted who a potential challenger might be:
"Given this, MASKS appears challengeable to me, and I would expect someone (cough, Upper Deck, cough) might just try."
Just seven days later, Upper Deck filed a request for an extension of time to oppose Panini's MASKS application.
Legal translation: Sometimes, I'm right!
It's not a full-blown opposition. It's a request by Upper Deck for an extension of time so that it could think a little bit longer about whether or not to oppose the MASKS mark. Or, maybe, to talk to Panini to see if it could resolve the matter without the need for a formal opposition.
Given that it's no longer a NHL licensee, I don't think Panini will want to spend money protecting a mark it might not use in the near future, so it might just let this application lapse. Or, since Upper Deck is the NHL's exclusive licensee, maybe Upper Deck might want to buy this mark from Panini.
I could be wrong. Panini might want to fight. It could release unlicensed NHL products. And masks are worn in the NFL too.
Lots of ways this could go.
The Trademark Office gave Upper Deck until May 10 to decide whether or not it wants to file an opposition (or, to file another motion to extend time). So, we'll likely know by then which way Upper Deck and Panini want to go.
The information provided in Paul Lesko's "Law of Cards" column is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues commonly encountered in the sports industry. This information is not intended to create any legal relationship between Paul Lesko, the Simmons Browder Gianaris Angelides & Barnerd LLC or any attorney and the user. Neither the transmission nor receipt of these website materials will create an attorney-client relationship between the author and the readers.
The views expressed in the "Law of Cards" column are solely those of the author and are not affiliated with the Simmons Law Firm. You should not act or rely on any information in the "Law of Cards" column without seeking the advice of an attorney. The determination of whether you need legal services and your choice of a lawyer are very important matters that should not be based on websites or advertisements.