Cryptozoic's Hex has attracted legal issues like mosquitoes to a bug zapper.
Legal aside: It's summer, it's been raining a lot, and I've been bitten by mosquitoes on an almost daily basis. Plus, the bug reference will make more sense in few paragraphs.
First, Wizards of the Coast accused Hex of being a Magic the Gathering knockoff and swarmed it with trademark, patent and something like 190 potential copyright claims.
Legal aside: In all fairness, Wizards of the Coast did recently agree to limit the number of copyright claims it'll assert against Cryptozoic, but as of now, there's still a swarm of IP issues in that case.
Amid the bad news of the Wizards of the Coast suit, Cryptozoic did receive some good HEX news: its HEX trademark application was approved by the Trademark Office and published for opposition.
Legal translation: Just one more step and then it would be registered!
But then came the second bit of irritating, legal, Hex news: a company called Innovation First, Inc. requested additional time from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board to consider whether or not it wanted to formally challenge Cryptozoic's HEX.
And this action halted the HEX application from proceeding.
Who is Innovation First? Well, it's the maker of those HEXBUG toys your kids love. Innovation First also owns trademarks on HEX and HEXBUG for "Toys and playsets, namely, mechanical action toys in the nature of creatures, vehicles, tracks, mechanisms, and parts thereof."
Innovation First appears to be concerned that Cryptozoic's HEX, which covers, among other things "paper goods, namely, comic books,…trading cards, coloring books, adhesive stickers, …posters,…pictures,…photographs and prints" might be a little too close to its "toys" trademarks.
Since Innovation First did not file a full-blown opposition, I imagine it is going to reach out to Cryptozoic to see if the parties can resolve this issue without the need to file an actual case.
Most likely, Innovation First simply wants Cryptozoic to limit its HEX application to trading card games, so it won't spread into other areas (like toys). If Cryptozoic can live with that, this will be a short-lived legal matter.
Legal comment: I don't see any overlap between these marks, so Innovation First's filing really is a minor annoyance. If Cryptozoic does not plan on launching Hex toys, it might try to exterminate the HEXBUG battle so it can focus on the much larger Wizards of the Coast case.
This would be in Cryptozoic's best interest because the Wizards of the Coast case won't be easy to swat. That case is going to bug Cryptozoic for a long time.
The information provided in Paul Lesko's "Law of Cards" column is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues commonly encountered in the sports industry. This information is not intended to create any legal relationship between Paul Lesko, Simmons Hanly Conroy or any attorney and the user. Neither the transmission nor receipt of these website materials will create an attorney-client relationship between the author and the readers.
The views expressed in the "Law of Cards" column are solely those of the author and are not affiliated with Simmons Hanly Conroy. You should not act or rely on any information in the "Law of Cards" column without seeking the advice of an attorney. The determination of whether you need legal services and your choice of a lawyer are very important matters that should not be based on websites or advertisements.