DRIP – 600×100
Collx Main Banner

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Baseball Card Legal Terms

Baseball Card Legal Terms

The most important skill a future lawyer takes away from law school is issue spotting. In other words, when given a hypothetical situation, how many potential legal problems can you identify? This helps lawyers protect their clients. It's also why if you have a lawyer in the family, they probably annoy you when they visit your house (“You might want to clean up that ice on your front walk--someone could get hurt.").

Baseball cards provide good practice for issuing spotting. Everyone knows legalese is strewn all over baseball cards. You may even have a basic idea of what it means. But do you really know? Many people also interchangeably use the terms “copyright," “patent" and “trademark," so we'll address each of these areas too, just to make sure everyone is using the same definitions.

Really, you don't need a law degree to spot potential issues with baseball cards (well…some issues). All you need are a few basic definitions. Once you understand the legalese, you can have fun trying to spot the issues.

First, a quick training course. Card manufacturers and licensees love their legal symbols and legalese. The most popular symbols are: ®, ™ and ©. Each means something different:

The ® and ™ symbols focus on trademark rights. A trademark is a unique mark, logo, etc., that is used by a company or organization to differentiate itself, its products or its services from others. A good example of a trademark is the MLB logo. The MLB logo is marked on cards to show the product is endorsed by Major League Baseball. Look at a baseball card, its wrapper or box and see how many places you can find the MLB logo with a ® after it. It's everywhere. Except of course, on the 2010 Upper Deck Series 1, but we'll get to that later.

™ denotes that the owner is claiming trademark rights, but does not have a registration from the Trademark Office because the trademark registration is pending, was rejected, or the owner did not file for a registered trademark.

® - Registered trademark. A registered trademark is more powerful than just claiming trademark rights. The trademark owner took the time to register the mark with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. To receive an ®, the trademark underwent an examination process. With a registered trademark, the trademark owner has additional rights as well as leverage in lawsuits.

© - A claim of copyright. Copyright law protects original works of authorship including literary, dramatic, musical, and artistic works, such as poetry, novels, movies, songs, computer software, and architecture. It does not protect facts or ideas, although it may protect the way facts or ideas are selected and organized. The majority of content on a baseball card is protected through copyright (player photo, card design and art, potentially the selection and arrangement of statistics on the back of card, etc.).

Unlike the ®, a © does not mean a filing was made at the copyright office for protection. Regardless, the owner can file for a copyright registration at any time. Also, a copyright owner really needs to have a copyright registration before it can sue for infringing on their work.

Beyond the ®, ™ and ©, baseball cards have additional legalese.

Mentions of “licenses" means a contract exists allowing one company (the licensee) to use the property of another (the licensor). Most commonly for cards, the licensed content includes the player's image, the team name, uniform, MLB logo, etc.

And finally, if something on the card is protected by a patent, the patent number itself will be listed. Typically, the card will just read, “U.S. Patent No. X,XXX,XXX" (patents do not get their own special symbol). Now, companies do not mark products with patent numbers just to show everyone how smart they are; patent numbers are marked on products to give potential infringers notice of the patent. It's a “KEEP OUT" sign. If patent owners mark their products with patent numbers, courts assume infringers were aware of the patent, and the patent owner can collect damages starting from when the product was first marked as a “patented" product. This way, infringers can't claim they did not know about the patent because it's available for all to see.

Now that we have the definitions, let's see how we do with issue spotting. For example, let's look at the Buster Posey's 2010 Upper Deck rookie card.

Baseball Card Legal Terms 1

Two issues jump out on this card. First, the Upper Deck symbol in the upper left hand corner has a TM, not a ®. Why? Well, Upper Deck did not receive a registration on that mark until June 22, 2010 (from USPTO records for Registration No. 3807558). If you look at Upper Deck's current cards like its 2011 football cards, the same symbol has a ® now. So, we spotted an issue that was not an issue—Upper Deck filed for a registered trademark, but hadn't received it in time for the product release.

The second, and most important issue to spot, is that this card is explicitly not licensed by the MLB or any MLB teams. That's because in 2010 Topps was the only company to get a license from MLB. This presented a problem for Upper Deck who had a license with the Major League Baseball Players' Association (as reflected on the bottom of the card) to show players' images and use their names, but no license with MLB. So, Upper Deck tried creating cards that focused only on MLBPA's property while blocking out MLB's property. That's why when you look at the front of the Buster Posey card, the photo selected has the batter's arm across the Giant's logo, and the “SF" on the batting helmet is somewhat obscured.

Baseball Card Legal Terms 2

Now, this issue we spotted, was a real issue with MLB. Despite Upper Deck's efforts to obscure the team logos, MLB sued Upper Deck anyway. The MLB contended that without a license, Upper Deck was not allowed to show any MLB property (e.g., uniforms, team names, etc.). Upper Deck fired back that it did have a license with the Major League Baseball Players Association to show players, and that was all it was doing. Rather than risk a court deciding the issues, both sides settled the case. From the lawyers' prospective, I liked MLB's position better, but I do sympathize with Upper Deck. Its license with MLBPA became basically worthless—who wants to see a baseball player in street clothes?

Any card collector knows that trading cards are more than just pictures of athletes with statistics on the back; trading cards are pieces of modern Americana that tell stories. Most of the stories involve the sport or the athlete, but not the card itself. The legalese on the cards, however, can tell stories about the card and collection too. With an understanding of the legalese, you can broaden your enjoyment of your collection, and tell others not just about the player, but about the story of the card itself.

The information provided in Paul Lesko's “Law of Cards" column is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues commonly encountered in the sports industry. This information is not intended to create any legal relationship between Paul Lesko, the Simmons Browder Gianaris Angelides & Barnerd LLC or any attorney and the user. Neither the transmission nor receipt of these website materials will create an attorney-client relationship between the author and the readers.

The views expressed in the “Law of Cards" column are solely those of the author and are not affiliated with the Simmons Law Firm. You should not act or rely on any information in the “Law of Cards" column without seeking the advice of an attorney. The determination of whether you need legal services and your choice of a lawyer are very important matters that should not be based on websites or advertisements.

Baseball Card Legal Terms 3Making purchases through affiliate links can earn the site a commission
Paul Lesko has litigated complex and intellectual property actions for over 18 years. Don’t hold the fact that Paul is a lawyer against him, he’s also a rabid baseball and college basketball fan, and an avid card collector. He's also the author of the novel Gastric Bypass, available for purchase at Amazon. Paul can be found on Twitter @Paul_Lesko and Google+.

User Comments

Jon Gross
Jon Gross

Great read Paul. Concerning our numerous doubles and repeats. Can the consumer alter a card by cutting out player image and create 3D art for resale? My son and I are using player image cut from on card and attaching it to same card thats intact creating a very nice However a little chessey affect. We have sold hundreds, some for… Way too much. I don’t interact much with the general collecting community so I’m curios how card altering is viewed by the expert collectors. Thank you in advance.
Jon & Jesse

Dennis System
Dennis System

any ideas on the fact that, because theres a chance/gambling element to part of the hobby, that we’ll ever see restrictions on how we can buy wax/caps on product prices? 2011 ledgendary cuts at 250/pak seems like gambling to me. any merit to my thougts?

thx in advance

Great article Paul. If upperdeck were successfully sued, could stores still legally sell this product or would it have to be pulled from the shelves?

Leave a Comment:

will not be published