Law of Cards: Trademark Battle Looming Between Upper Deck and Cleveland Indians?

Law of Cards: Trademark Battle Looming Between Upper Deck and Cleveland Indians?

Back in 2007, Upper Deck filed a trademark application for the word TRIBE, basically, for use with trading cards. UD's TRIBE application bounced around the Trademark Office for six years, until just recently when it was approved and then published in July 2013.

Well, UD's drawn-out process to obtain this mark is going to stretch on longer, because on August 15, the Cleveland Indians filed a request for an extension of time to oppose the mark.

Legal translation: "We're likely going to oppose this, but we want to think about it some more. And maybe reach out to UD to see if they'll just drop it so we don't need to spend money litigating this."

Given that the Indians are known as the Tribe and also have a registered trademark for TRIBE (which dates back to an alleged first use in 1917), a potential opposition by the Indians is not a real shocker.

The Indians now have until November 13 to file an opposition. While Upper Deck and Cleveland's marks do not technically overlap (the Indians' trademark is more focused on "entertainment services" rather than products like trading cards), the Indians are a deep pocket, and it's unclear that the Tribe trademark is important enough for Upper Deck to spend a lot of time and money to try and beat them.

Given this, I suspect Upper Deck will drop its TRIBE application prior to the 13th.

The information provided in Paul Lesko's "Law of Cards" column is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues commonly encountered in the sports industry. This information is not intended to create any legal relationship between Paul Lesko, the Simmons Browder Gianaris Angelides & Barnerd LLC or any attorney and the user. Neither the transmission nor receipt of these website materials will create an attorney-client relationship between the author and the readers.

The views expressed in the "Law of Cards" column are solely those of the author and are not affiliated with the Simmons Law Firm. You should not act or rely on any information in the "Law of Cards" column without seeking the advice of an attorney. The determination of whether you need legal services and your choice of a lawyer are very important matters that should not be based on websites or advertisements.

Top eBay Listings

2013 Upper Deck Ultimate Rookie Signatures Auto Autograph Joseph Randle 82 199
$12.97

2013 Upper Deck SPX SPX Signatures Rookie Auto Autograph Kenny Stills Sooners
$12.97

2013 Upper Deck Ultimate Rookie Signatures Auto Autograph Robert Woods 3 10
$49.97

2013 Upper Deck Quantum 3 CLR Patch Auto Autograph Cordarrelle Patterson 60 99
$49.97

2013 Upper Deck UD Exquisite Autograph Rc Lache Seastrunk 99
$49.99

2013-14 Upper Deck SPX Morgan Rielly SSP RC Auto 02 15
$278.99

2013-14 THE CUP BRILLIANCE MARCEL DIONNE KING LOS ANGELES CENTER #B-MD
$12.99

UPPER DECK TEAM CANADA 2013-14 ANDREW LADD AUTOGRAPH JETS
$10.99

Nancy Lopez 2012 Upper Deck Goodwin Champions Autograph Card #ANL Auto
$12.00

2013 Upper Deck University of Kansas Jayhawks Auto Walt Wesley ks Hall of Fame
$21.99

2013 UPPER DECK EXQUISITE JSY PATCH AUTO RC DOUG MARTIN 64 99
$250.00

MAXIME SAUVE , 2012-13 , UPPER DECK , THE CUP , AUTO , PATCH , ROOKIE , 45 74
$25.00

2012 upper deck SP Signature Derek Jeter Torre T.Martinez triple auto 10 15!!!
$400.00

2013 Upper Deck Priority Signings Alexander Ovechkin Autograph 10 BGS 9.5 7 8
$194.99

2012 UPPER DECK EXQUISITE JUSTIN BLACKMON AUTO PATCH RC JAGUARS 88 99
$100.00

Todd Gurley 1 2 US Flag Patch Auto 2012 Upper Deck USA Football Future Swatch
$5,504.95
« Previous1234

 |  E-Mail | URL
Paul Lesko is a shareholder at Simmons Hanly Conroy and the chair of its Intellectual Property Department (http://www.simmonsfirm.com). Don’t hold the fact that Paul is a lawyer against him, he’s also a rabid baseball and college basketball fan, and an avid baseball card collector. Paul can be found on Twitter @Paul_Lesko and Google+.

User Comments

  1. How the heck are they granted a trademark that is already being used? Even if a different way wouldn’t somebody at the trademark office think this may cause some friction and just deny the application.

    Leave a Comment: