Law of Cards: Trademark Battle Looming Between Upper Deck and Cleveland Indians?

Law of Cards: Trademark Battle Looming Between Upper Deck and Cleveland Indians?

Back in 2007, Upper Deck filed a trademark application for the word TRIBE, basically, for use with trading cards. UD's TRIBE application bounced around the Trademark Office for six years, until just recently when it was approved and then published in July 2013.

Well, UD's drawn-out process to obtain this mark is going to stretch on longer, because on August 15, the Cleveland Indians filed a request for an extension of time to oppose the mark.

Legal translation: "We're likely going to oppose this, but we want to think about it some more. And maybe reach out to UD to see if they'll just drop it so we don't need to spend money litigating this."

Blowout In Post Ad

Given that the Indians are known as the Tribe and also have a registered trademark for TRIBE (which dates back to an alleged first use in 1917), a potential opposition by the Indians is not a real shocker.

The Indians now have until November 13 to file an opposition. While Upper Deck and Cleveland's marks do not technically overlap (the Indians' trademark is more focused on "entertainment services" rather than products like trading cards), the Indians are a deep pocket, and it's unclear that the Tribe trademark is important enough for Upper Deck to spend a lot of time and money to try and beat them.

Given this, I suspect Upper Deck will drop its TRIBE application prior to the 13th.

The information provided in Paul Lesko's "Law of Cards" column is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues commonly encountered in the sports industry. This information is not intended to create any legal relationship between Paul Lesko, the Simmons Browder Gianaris Angelides & Barnerd LLC or any attorney and the user. Neither the transmission nor receipt of these website materials will create an attorney-client relationship between the author and the readers.

The views expressed in the "Law of Cards" column are solely those of the author and are not affiliated with the Simmons Law Firm. You should not act or rely on any information in the "Law of Cards" column without seeking the advice of an attorney. The determination of whether you need legal services and your choice of a lawyer are very important matters that should not be based on websites or advertisements.

Top eBay Listings

2013-14 John Tavares BGS 9.5 10 Auto Upper Deck Trilogy Signature Pucks Gold Ink
$59.99

2013-14 Zenon Konopka BGS 9.5 GM Upper Deck Black Diamond SP Gemography Auto 10
$29.99

Joe Sakic 2013-14 Upper Deck The Cup Scripted sticks auto 4 35 Nordiques
$175.00

PATRICK ROY 2013-14 UPPER DECK THE CUP LIMITED LOGOS PATCH AUTO #5 10 CANADIENS
$399.00

2013 UPPER DECK NOTRE DAME GOLDEN TATE AUTOGRAPH
$15.99

2013-14 Upper Deck O-Pee-Chee AUTO Team Canada"Signatures" TC-LL Louis Leblanc
$14.99

T.J. TJ WARREN 2013-14 UPPER DECK EXQUISITE ROOKIE AUTOGRAPH AUTO RC SP 93 99
$15.99

THOMAS HICKEY 2013-14 Upper Deck Overtime Rookie Auto New York Islanders RC
$13.99

Terrence Williams 2013 Upper Deck SPx Jersey Rookie Autograph #d 471 475 Cowboys
$14.99

2012 Upper Deck MLS Marks #CA Camilo Sanvezzo Auto 35
$40.00

2012 Upper Deck MLS Marks #PM Pablo Mastroeni Auto 35
$40.00

2012 Upper Deck MLS Super Draft Signatures #AJ Andrew Jean-Baptiste Auto
$20.00

2012 Upper Deck MLS Super Draft Signatures #KR Kelyn Rowe Auto
$20.00

2013-14 Upper Deck SP Authentic Chirography Beau Bennett Autograph #30 75
$20.00

2013 Upper Deck SPx Le'veon Bell Patch Auto 5 2 Color Patch 4 5 Rare!
$150.00

2013 13-14 Upper Deck Trilogy #193 Rickard Rakell Autograph RC Rookie 44 49
$39.99
« Previous1234


 |  E-Mail | URL
Paul Lesko has litigated intellectual property for over 15 years. Don’t hold the fact that Paul is a lawyer against him, he’s also a rabid baseball and college basketball fan, and an avid baseball card collector. Paul can be found on Twitter @Paul_Lesko and Google+.

User Comments

  1. How the heck are they granted a trademark that is already being used? Even if a different way wouldn’t somebody at the trademark office think this may cause some friction and just deny the application.

    Leave a Comment:

MENU