Law of Cards: Trademark Battle Looming Between Upper Deck and Cleveland Indians?

Law of Cards: Trademark Battle Looming Between Upper Deck and Cleveland Indians?

Back in 2007, Upper Deck filed a trademark application for the word TRIBE, basically, for use with trading cards. UD's TRIBE application bounced around the Trademark Office for six years, until just recently when it was approved and then published in July 2013.

Well, UD's drawn-out process to obtain this mark is going to stretch on longer, because on August 15, the Cleveland Indians filed a request for an extension of time to oppose the mark.

Legal translation: "We're likely going to oppose this, but we want to think about it some more. And maybe reach out to UD to see if they'll just drop it so we don't need to spend money litigating this."

Given that the Indians are known as the Tribe and also have a registered trademark for TRIBE (which dates back to an alleged first use in 1917), a potential opposition by the Indians is not a real shocker.

The Indians now have until November 13 to file an opposition. While Upper Deck and Cleveland's marks do not technically overlap (the Indians' trademark is more focused on "entertainment services" rather than products like trading cards), the Indians are a deep pocket, and it's unclear that the Tribe trademark is important enough for Upper Deck to spend a lot of time and money to try and beat them.

Given this, I suspect Upper Deck will drop its TRIBE application prior to the 13th.

The information provided in Paul Lesko's "Law of Cards" column is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues commonly encountered in the sports industry. This information is not intended to create any legal relationship between Paul Lesko, the Simmons Browder Gianaris Angelides & Barnerd LLC or any attorney and the user. Neither the transmission nor receipt of these website materials will create an attorney-client relationship between the author and the readers.

The views expressed in the "Law of Cards" column are solely those of the author and are not affiliated with the Simmons Law Firm. You should not act or rely on any information in the "Law of Cards" column without seeking the advice of an attorney. The determination of whether you need legal services and your choice of a lawyer are very important matters that should not be based on websites or advertisements.

Top eBay Listings

2012 UPPER DECK UD BLACK KELLEN MOORE ROOKIE AUTO 149 199 LIONS NICE
$12.99

2013 Upper Deck Quantum Monumental Dual Auto John Elway Dan Marino 5 5 BGS 9
$499.99

2013-14 Upper Deck Exquisite Old School Signatures Bill Walton Auto 37 75
$29.99

2012-2013 Upper Deck Artifacts Alex Ovechkin Auto Capitals A-AO Autograph
$79.00

2012-13 Upper Deck Black Diamond Emerald #2 Jonathan Ericsson Autograph 10
$79.83

BH Born 2013 Upper Deck University of Kansas Basketball AUTOGRAPH Card *O538
$39.95

Calvin Thompson 2013 Upper Deck University of Kansas Basketball AUTOGRAPH *O540
$39.95

Drew Gooden 2013 Upper Deck University of Kansas Basketball AUTOGRAPH Card *O542
$39.95

2013-14 MICHAEL SGARBOSSA UPPER DECK TEAM CANADA SIGNATURES AUTO #198
$14.99

Billy Thomas 2013 Upper Deck University of Kansas Basketball AUTOGRAPH *O543
$29.95

2013-14 MICHAEL SGARBOSSA UPPER DECK TEAM CANADA SIGNATURES ROOKIE AUTO #198
$14.99

Kenny Gregory 2013 Upper Deck University of Kansas Basketball AUTOGRAPH *O545
$29.95

Eric Pauley 2013 Upper Deck University of Kansas Basketball AUTOGRAPH Card *O547
$24.95

Nolen Ellison 2013 Upper Deck University of Kansas Basketball AUTOGRAPH *O548
$24.95

Kevin Pritchard 2013 Upper Deck University of Kansas Basketball AUTOGRAPH *O549
$24.95

Adonis Jordan 2013 Upper Deck University of Kansas Basketball AUTOGRAPH *O550
$24.95
« Previous1234

 |  E-Mail | URL
Paul Lesko has litigated intellectual property for over 15 years. Don’t hold the fact that Paul is a lawyer against him, he’s also a rabid baseball and college basketball fan, and an avid baseball card collector. Paul can be found on Twitter @Paul_Lesko and Google+.

User Comments

  1. How the heck are they granted a trademark that is already being used? Even if a different way wouldn’t somebody at the trademark office think this may cause some friction and just deny the application.

    Leave a Comment:

MENU