Law of Cards: Topps Dismissed from Electronic Trading Cards Lawsuit

Law of Cards: Topps Dismissed from Electronic Trading Cards Lawsuit

A slew of defendants just followed Panini's lead, and have left the Wildcat electronic card lawsuit.

As previously reported, on December 17, Wildcat settled with and then dismissed Panini from the lawsuit. In short order thereafter, Electronic Arts (on December 19), Wizards of the Coast (on December 19), Topps (on December 20) and Sony (on December 20) also entered into settlement agreements, and were later dismissed from the suit by Wildcat.

This dramatically shrinks the case and leaves just a few defendants, including Konami, who very well might have been the only party that argued against Wildcat in the December 20 Markman hearing.

The terms of Wildcat's settlements with Electronic Arts, Wizards of the Coast, Topps and Sony are confidential (like the Panini settlement), so it's difficult to tell who "won" and who "lost" (if anyone did win or lose).

However, if things keep following this settlement track, the clear winner will be the court because it won’t need to rule on the esoteric argument of whether an electronic trading card that only "is" collected rather than one that "can be" collected infringes this patent.

The information provided in Paul Lesko's "Law of Cards" column is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues commonly encountered in the sports industry. This information is not intended to create any legal relationship between Paul Lesko, the Simmons Browder Gianaris Angelides & Barnerd LLC or any attorney and the user. Neither the transmission nor receipt of these website materials will create an attorney-client relationship between the author and the readers.

The views expressed in the "Law of Cards" column are solely those of the author and are not affiliated with the Simmons Law Firm. You should not act or rely on any information in the "Law of Cards" column without seeking the advice of an attorney. The determination of whether you need legal services and your choice of a lawyer are very important matters that should not be based on websites or advertisements.

Top eBay Listings

2013 Topps Triple Threads Franklin Auto Jersey Rookie Serial # 80 99 RC

2012 Topps Valor Legionary Autograph Rookie Strength LA-LM Lamar Miller Auto 3j7

2013 Topps Allen & Ginter's #AGA-WR Wilin Rosario 409 Colorado Rockies Auto 5m0

2013 Topps Tribute Vida Blue parallel Blue auto numbered 43 50

2013 Topps Triple Threads Montee Ball 20 50 Auto Rc Triple Relics Emerald # 152

Landry Jones 2013 Topps Finest Red Refractor Auto Patch Rc 41 75 Steelers Rookie

Kerwynn Williams 2013 Topps Platinum Frost Refractor Auto Rc 18 50 on card auto

2012 Topps Finest AR-RL Ryan Lavarnway 99 Boston Red Sox Auto Baseball Card 4n0

2012 Topps Triple Threads #TTUAR-31 Danny Espinosa 99 Auto Baseball Card 0f5

2012 Topps Tier One #OR-JWE Jemile Weeks 25 Oakland Athletics Auto Card 4n0

Mike Gillislee 2013 Topps Triple Threads Rookie Autograph Relic 41 50 Emerald

FRANK ROBINSON AUTOGRAPH Card - 2013 Topps - Baltimore Orioles
« Previous12345

 |  E-Mail | URL
Paul Lesko has litigated intellectual property for over 15 years. Don’t hold the fact that Paul is a lawyer against him, he’s also a rabid baseball and college basketball fan, and an avid baseball card collector. Paul can be found on Twitter @Paul_Lesko and Google+.

Leave a Comment: