Law of Cards: Topps Aims to Knockout KNOCKOUTS AND TAPOUTS Trademark
Topps is currently on a winning streak when it comes to opposing and cancelling others' trademarks. Recently, it tackled USA Football's HUDDLE mark, and cleared the way for its own HUDDLE mark. Topps also convinced another trademark owner to drop his BLOODLINES application after threatening a trademark opposition. This ensured protection for Topps' UFC BLOODLINES product.
Continuing this trend, on April 30, Topps petitioned the Trademark Office to knockout an individual named Heath Mark Gertridge's KNOCKOUTS AND TAPOUTS registration.
The reason? Topps has been using its trademark KNOCKOUT for the last four years for a line of UFC trading cards. In 2013, Topps filed for a KNOCKOUT trademark registration. To its dismay, the Trademark Office twice rejected its application in view of Gertridge's already registered KNOCKOUTS AND TAPOUTS trademark.
So, to get its KNOCKOUT registration from the Trademark Office, Topps will, unfortunately, have to knockout Gertridge's KNOCKOUTS AND TAPOUTS registration.
To do this, Topps contends in its recently filed petition that Gertridge's mark should be cancelled because he allegedly is not using it in commerce.
Legal translation: Unlike other intellectual property, if you do not use your trademark in commerce, you could lose it.
This is an interesting approach. Gertridge's trademark dates back to 2007, when he filed his application to cover, "Board games; Card games; Dice games; Promotional game cards; Trading card games." It's unclear if Gertridge currently sells a KNOCKOUTS AND TAPOUTS product, but, he does have a website up and running showing the game in action. So, technically, he might be using the mark in commerce. And if he can show recent sales (more than a de minimus amount), he might just halt Topps' winning streak.
Gertridge has until June 15, 2014, to respond. I have a feeling, however, that Gertridge no longer sells his product, and therefore, his mark might be deemed abandoned. Or, like with USA Football, there's a chance Gertridge won't show up. If that happens, Topps will win by TKO. Or what I hope would be the best result, would be for Topps to broker a deal to pay Gertridge to voluntarily drop his trademark registration. That way, everyone wins.
But that rarely happens in trading card litigation.
The information provided in Paul Lesko's "Law of Cards" column is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues commonly encountered in the sports industry. This information is not intended to create any legal relationship between Paul Lesko, the Simmons Browder Gianaris Angelides & Barnerd LLC or any attorney and the user. Neither the transmission nor receipt of these website materials will create an attorney-client relationship between the author and the readers.
The views expressed in the "Law of Cards" column are solely those of the author and are not affiliated with the Simmons Law Firm. You should not act or rely on any information in the "Law of Cards" column without seeking the advice of an attorney. The determination of whether you need legal services and your choice of a lawyer are very important matters that should not be based on websites or advertisements.