Law of Cards: Owner of KNOCKOUTS AND TAPOUTS Trademark Looks to Tapout

Law of Cards: Owner of KNOCKOUTS AND TAPOUTS Trademark Looks to Tapout

In the hopes of obtaining a KNOCKOUT trademark registration, last April, Topps petitioned to cancel heath Mark Gertridge's KNOCKOUTS AND TAPOUTS registration. Topps' basis, basically, was that it believed Gertridge no longer used his mark in commerce. If true, this would allow the Trademark Trial and Appeals Board to quickly cancel Gertridge's mark, and clear the way for Topps' KNOCKOUT mark.

Legal translation: "We think he's not using it, so he should lose it. And because we're using it, we should get it."

Unfortunately for Topps, Gertridge answered Topps' cancellation and claims he still uses his trademark in commerce.

The response bars an easy win for Topps. Now instead of showing "abandonment," Topps would have to show there is no "likelihood of confusion" between KNOCKOUTS AND TAPOUTS and a KNOCKOUT mark even though both marks appear on trading cards.

A likelihood of confusion analysis is a lot more complicated, requires experts and surveys, and would cost Topps a lot more time and money than simply filing documents showing "he no longer sells KNOCKOUTS AND TAPOUTS products."

Fortunately for Topps, later in his answer Gertridge capitulates to coexistence of both marks:

I add that in my opinion the trademarking of the word KNOCKOUT on its own is not an infringement of my mark of KNOCKOUTS AND TAPOUTS, nor would the trademarking of the word TAPOUT by an infringement on my mark of KNOCKOUTS AND TAPOUTS. My trademark is KNOCKOUTS AND TAPOUTS. It is not KNOCKOUT, and it is not TAPOUT. Those singular words on their own are not an infringement on my mark. They are common use words in the English language and my trademark is not intended to stop anyone from the use of those words individually on any product even if it happened to be a product in the same categories as my own. I believe that the Petitioner's Application to register KNOCKOUT was refused in a laudable act in attempt to protect my intellectual property rights. However, I have no issue with Petitioner being granted registration of the mark KNOCKOUT. I further have no issue with them using it for any category of goods.

Legal translation: There's room enough in the world for both of our marks!

Given Gertridge's "tapout," Topps' cancellation should end quickly, likely with a co-existence agreement between Gertridge and Topps.

Don't lose the irony here. Both trademarks cover professional fighting. Topps started a battle to cancel Gertridge's marks with its own brand of professional fighters (lawyers). Yet despite this, this dispute looks to end with peaceful coexistence.

Maybe these fighters then can show the rest of the trading card world how to get along with each other.

Yeah right.

The information provided in Paul Lesko's "Law of Cards" column is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues commonly encountered in the sports industry. This information is not intended to create any legal relationship between Paul Lesko, the Simmons Browder Gianaris Angelides & Barnerd LLC or any attorney and the user. Neither the transmission nor receipt of these website materials will create an attorney-client relationship between the author and the readers.

The views expressed in the "Law of Cards" column are solely those of the author and are not affiliated with the Simmons Law Firm. You should not act or rely on any information in the "Law of Cards" column without seeking the advice of an attorney. The determination of whether you need legal services and your choice of a lawyer are very important matters that should not be based on websites or advertisements.

ebaysmalllogo Image
2911555016714040 1 Image
STIPE MIOCIC 2014 Topps UFC Knockout Autograph AUTO RELIC 174 275
2911555016764040 1 Image
RICARDO LAMAS 2014 Topps UFC Knockout Autograph AUTO 2 COLOR RELIC 248 275
2911555016944040 1 Image
JAKE ELLENBERGER 2014 Topps UFC Knockout Autograph AUTO RELIC 186 275
3011950660514040 1 Image
PAT HEALY 2014 Topps UFC Knockout Autograph AUTO 2 COLOR RELIC 6 275
3011950660804040 1 Image
RAFAEL dos ANJOS 2014 Topps UFC Knockout Autograph 1st AUTO 11 149
3011950660814040 1 Image
DEMETRIOUS JOHNSON 2014 Topps UFC Knockout Autograph AUTO 131 149
1913436581654040 1 Image
2013 Topps UFC Knockout Fighter-Worn Memorabilia Autograph Auto Anderson Silva
2716155224664040 1 Image
2014 Topps UFC Knockout Triple Threads Autograph Relics Urijah Faber Auto 12 18
3009271284394040 1 Image
Ufc Topps Knockout Jake Ellenberger 1st Auto 101 188
1815362899834040 1 Image
Urijah Faber 2012 Topps UFC Knockout AUTO #10 10 Fist-Ograph Autograph Fistprint
2909397096774040 1 Image
2012 Topps UFC Knockout Alan Belcher 1st Autograph 142 159 FAAB NM Condition
2313654270094040 1 Image
Michael Bisping 2014 Topps Knockout Twitter 22 25 Ufc Auto
3610312043354040 1 Image
3609444719454040 1 Image
2013 Topps UFC Knockout Autograph Relic Worn Memorabilia Auto Louis Gaudinot 399
2814737727734040 1 Image
2010 Topps UFC Knockout Rousimar Palhares 1st Autograph0 179 188
2814737729514040 1 Image
2010 Topps UFC Knockout Mike Brown Autograph 030 188
« Previous1234
 |  E-Mail | URL
Paul Lesko is a shareholder at Simmons Hanly Conroy and the chair of its Intellectual Property Department ( Don’t hold the fact that Paul is a lawyer against him, he’s also a rabid baseball and college basketball fan, and an avid baseball card collector. Paul can be found on Twitter @Paul_Lesko and Google+.

Leave a Comment: