Law of Cards: Owner of KNOCKOUTS AND TAPOUTS Trademark Looks to Tapout

Law of Cards: Owner of KNOCKOUTS AND TAPOUTS Trademark Looks to Tapout

In the hopes of obtaining a KNOCKOUT trademark registration, last April, Topps petitioned to cancel heath Mark Gertridge's KNOCKOUTS AND TAPOUTS registration. Topps' basis, basically, was that it believed Gertridge no longer used his mark in commerce. If true, this would allow the Trademark Trial and Appeals Board to quickly cancel Gertridge's mark, and clear the way for Topps' KNOCKOUT mark.

Legal translation: "We think he's not using it, so he should lose it. And because we're using it, we should get it."

Unfortunately for Topps, Gertridge answered Topps' cancellation and claims he still uses his trademark in commerce.

The response bars an easy win for Topps. Now instead of showing "abandonment," Topps would have to show there is no "likelihood of confusion" between KNOCKOUTS AND TAPOUTS and a KNOCKOUT mark even though both marks appear on trading cards.

A likelihood of confusion analysis is a lot more complicated, requires experts and surveys, and would cost Topps a lot more time and money than simply filing documents showing "he no longer sells KNOCKOUTS AND TAPOUTS products."

Fortunately for Topps, later in his answer Gertridge capitulates to coexistence of both marks:

I add that in my opinion the trademarking of the word KNOCKOUT on its own is not an infringement of my mark of KNOCKOUTS AND TAPOUTS, nor would the trademarking of the word TAPOUT by an infringement on my mark of KNOCKOUTS AND TAPOUTS. My trademark is KNOCKOUTS AND TAPOUTS. It is not KNOCKOUT, and it is not TAPOUT. Those singular words on their own are not an infringement on my mark. They are common use words in the English language and my trademark is not intended to stop anyone from the use of those words individually on any product even if it happened to be a product in the same categories as my own. I believe that the Petitioner's Application to register KNOCKOUT was refused in a laudable act in attempt to protect my intellectual property rights. However, I have no issue with Petitioner being granted registration of the mark KNOCKOUT. I further have no issue with them using it for any category of goods.

Legal translation: There's room enough in the world for both of our marks!

Given Gertridge's "tapout," Topps' cancellation should end quickly, likely with a co-existence agreement between Gertridge and Topps.

Don't lose the irony here. Both trademarks cover professional fighting. Topps started a battle to cancel Gertridge's marks with its own brand of professional fighters (lawyers). Yet despite this, this dispute looks to end with peaceful coexistence.

Maybe these fighters then can show the rest of the trading card world how to get along with each other.

Yeah right.

The information provided in Paul Lesko's "Law of Cards" column is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues commonly encountered in the sports industry. This information is not intended to create any legal relationship between Paul Lesko, the Simmons Browder Gianaris Angelides & Barnerd LLC or any attorney and the user. Neither the transmission nor receipt of these website materials will create an attorney-client relationship between the author and the readers.

The views expressed in the "Law of Cards" column are solely those of the author and are not affiliated with the Simmons Law Firm. You should not act or rely on any information in the "Law of Cards" column without seeking the advice of an attorney. The determination of whether you need legal services and your choice of a lawyer are very important matters that should not be based on websites or advertisements.

ebaysmalllogo Image
2215482752084040 1 Image
2012 Topps UFC Knockout Yoshihiro Akiyama Auto Relic
3009271284394040 1 Image
Ufc Topps Knockout Jake Ellenberger 1st Auto 101 188
2909397096774040 1 Image
2012 Topps UFC Knockout Alan Belcher 1st Autograph 142 159 FAAB NM Condition
3610312043354040 1 Image
3609444719454040 1 Image
2013 Topps UFC Knockout Autograph Relic Worn Memorabilia Auto Louis Gaudinot 399
1714663736764040 1 Image
2010 Topps UFC Knockout Bas Rutten 1st Auto Autograph 188
1614264609554040 1 Image
2010 Topps UFC Knockout Chuck Liddell Emerald 2 Color Relic Auto Autograph 29 88
1614264610714040 1 Image
2010 Topps UFC Knockout Gray Maynard White Relic Auto Autograph 188
1714663740574040 1 Image
2010 Topps UFC Knockout Jon Jones Auto Autograph 96 188
1714663744954040 1 Image
2010 Topps UFC Knockout Patrick Cote Premium Pieces 2 Color Relic Auto 14 50
1614264615334040 1 Image
2010 Topps UFC Knockout Urijah Faber Emerald 1st Auto Autograph 52 88
2616003001814040 1 Image
1614264700474040 1 Image
2012 Topps UFC Knockout Ben Benson Henderson Blue Relic Auto Autograph 275
1614264703344040 1 Image
2012 Topps UFC Knockout Jon Jones Black Relic Auto Autograph 150
1714663846734040 1 Image
2012 Topps UFC Knockout Joseph Benavidez Premium Pieces 2 Color Relic Auto 7
1614264710404040 1 Image
2012 Topps UFC Knockout Rashad Evans Premium Pieces 2 Color Relic Auto 77 88
« Previous1234
 |  E-Mail | URL
Paul Lesko is a shareholder at Simmons Hanly Conroy and the chair of its Intellectual Property Department ( Don’t hold the fact that Paul is a lawyer against him, he’s also a rabid baseball and college basketball fan, and an avid baseball card collector. Paul can be found on Twitter @Paul_Lesko and Google+.

Leave a Comment: