Law of Cards: Kareem Abdul-Jabbar v. Upper Deck Trial – Day 0.5 – UPDATE
UPDATE (4/12) - This morning it was announced the trial would be continued on Monday, delaying the start for a couple of days.
According to my firm's invaluable law clerk, Norry, the pregame warm-up for the Kareem Abdul-Jabbar v. Upper Deck case is in the books. Starting around 9 AM this morning, the court heard arguments on the parties' motions for sanctions.
Legal translation: Both sides argued that because of bad behavior by the other side, there is no need for a trial and they should automatically win.
For the most part, these motions were denied.
Legal translation: No one gets an easy win here. The trial will go on.
There were two specific and important issues that were addressed, however. First, Jabbar's attorneys will be able to ask McWilliam questions about the Konami litigation. Abdul-Jabbar's attorneys allege they need answers to show intent. This is a win for the plaintiff because the Konami litigation involved admissions by Upper Deck of counterfeiting.
Second, the judge indicated that Abdul-Jabbar's attorneys can go after McWilliam personally under an "alter-ego theory."
Legal translation: The plaintiff is free to argue that McWilliam and Upper Deck are one in the same.
This is good for the plaintiff because the more defendants in the case (Legal translation: the more deep pockets in the case), the better.
I think it's important to note that the attorneys on both sides were cordial with each other during the hearing. There was no yelling, kicking or screaming by anyone. Contrary to most television courtroom dramas, that is the norm for such cases, and it's good to see that's what happened here.
The rest of the status conference was continued in the judge's chamber, but it sets up what should be a good case tomorrow.
The information provided in Paul Lesko's "Law of Cards" column is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues commonly encountered in the sports industry. This information is not intended to create any legal relationship between Paul Lesko, the Simmons Browder Gianaris Angelides & Barnerd LLC or any attorney and the user. Neither the transmission nor receipt of these website materials will create an attorney-client relationship between the author and the readers.
The views expressed in the "Law of Cards" column are solely those of the author and are not affiliated with the Simmons Law Firm. You should not act or rely on any information in the "Law of Cards" column without seeking the advice of an attorney. The determination of whether you need legal services and your choice of a lawyer are very important matters that should not be based on websites or advertisements.