Law of Cards: Is Upper Deck Versus Executive Over?

Law of Cards: Is Upper Deck Versus Executive Over?

The crazy litigation between Upper Deck and Executive Trading over political trading cards appears to be over.

In a May 13 order, the court stated:

In light of the settlement of this case, all pending matters, including the Motion for Summary Judgment , Motion to Exclude Testimony of Tim Girvin , and Motion to Exclude Testimony of Dennis Mandell , are hereby DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and may be re-filed if the parties do not file a joint motion for dismissal by June 26, 2014 pursuant to Magistrate Judge Adler’s Order . The hearing set for June 12, 2014 is VACATED.

Basically, the court is putting everything on hold until June 26 to give the parties time to finalize a settlement agreement and dismissal order.

In all likelihood, the future filings won't tell us who won or lost given Upper Deck's drive to keep many of the documents in this case under seal, but we'll keep our eyes on the docket just in case.

It's too bad. I really enjoyed this case. From arguments over the definition of the word "insert" to Upper Deck's contention that even if it lost, Executive should only receive less than $201, it was full of humor.

Oh well. However, given how litigious this industry is, I'm sure a replacement case will pop up (cough...Beckett v. COMC...cough...).

The information provided in Paul Lesko's "Law of Cards" column is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues commonly encountered in the sports industry. This information is not intended to create any legal relationship between Paul Lesko, the Simmons Browder Gianaris Angelides & Barnerd LLC or any attorney and the user. Neither the transmission nor receipt of these website materials will create an attorney-client relationship between the author and the readers.

The views expressed in the "Law of Cards" column are solely those of the author and are not affiliated with the Simmons Law Firm. You should not act or rely on any information in the "Law of Cards" column without seeking the advice of an attorney. The determination of whether you need legal services and your choice of a lawyer are very important matters that should not be based on websites or advertisements.

Top eBay Listings

1956 Topps Lot Of 22 US Presidents Trading Cards

1964 Topps JFK #32 Debate With Richard Nixon - 1960 NM N72

1964 Topps JFK #9 Kennedy Clan 1934 NM N68

1964 Topps JFK #22 Pres. & Mrs. Kennedy At Bogota Col. NM N137

1964 Topps JFK #10 Navy Lt. Kennedy congratulated By Ca NM N69

1964 Topps JFK #3 Sen. Kennedy With Daughter Caroline NM N751

1964 Topps JFK #20 Pres. Kennedy At Mexico City NM N764

1964 Topps JFK #12 Lt. Kennedy Relaxes NM N51

1956 Topps U. S. Presidents #16 MILLARD FILLMORE - BEAUTIFUL EXMT++ CARD!

1956 Topps U. S. Presidents #24 CHESTER A. ARTHUR - BEAUTIFUL EXMT++ CARD!

1956 Topps U. S. Presidents #25 GROVER CLEVELAND - BEAUTIFUL EXMT++ CARD!

1956 TOPPS - U.S. Presidents COMPLETE #1-36 CARD SET - GUC

1972 Topps Presidents #29 Calvin Coolidge excellent condtion


John Kennedy JFK Speaks at Berlin Wall Relic Trading Card - Topps (2001) ITB WH

1956 Topps U.S. Presidents #23 James A. Garfield Near MINT
« Previous1234

 |  E-Mail | URL
Paul Lesko has litigated intellectual property for over 15 years. Don’t hold the fact that Paul is a lawyer against him, he’s also a rabid baseball and college basketball fan, and an avid baseball card collector. Paul can be found on Twitter @Paul_Lesko and Google+.

Leave a Comment: