Law of Cards: Upper Deck Poised to Challenge Panini's MASKS Trademark

Law of Cards: Upper Deck Poised to Challenge Panini’s MASKS Trademark

In a March 24 article, I explained that Panini's MASKS trademark application was published for opposition, and subtly hinted who a potential challenger might be:

"Given this, MASKS appears challengeable to me, and I would expect someone (cough, Upper Deck, cough) might just try."

Just seven days later, Upper Deck filed a request for an extension of time to oppose Panini's MASKS application.

Legal translation: Sometimes, I'm right!

It's not a full-blown opposition. It's a request by Upper Deck for an extension of time so that it could think a little bit longer about whether or not to oppose the MASKS mark. Or, maybe, to talk to Panini to see if it could resolve the matter without the need for a formal opposition.

Given that it's no longer a NHL licensee, I don't think Panini will want to spend money protecting a mark it might not use in the near future, so it might just let this application lapse. Or, since Upper Deck is the NHL's exclusive licensee, maybe Upper Deck might want to buy this mark from Panini.

I could be wrong. Panini might want to fight. It could release unlicensed NHL products. And masks are worn in the NFL too.

Lots of ways this could go.

The Trademark Office gave Upper Deck until May 10 to decide whether or not it wants to file an opposition (or, to file another motion to extend time). So, we'll likely know by then which way Upper Deck and Panini want to go.

The information provided in Paul Lesko's "Law of Cards" column is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues commonly encountered in the sports industry. This information is not intended to create any legal relationship between Paul Lesko, the Simmons Browder Gianaris Angelides & Barnerd LLC or any attorney and the user. Neither the transmission nor receipt of these website materials will create an attorney-client relationship between the author and the readers.

The views expressed in the "Law of Cards" column are solely those of the author and are not affiliated with the Simmons Law Firm. You should not act or rely on any information in the "Law of Cards" column without seeking the advice of an attorney. The determination of whether you need legal services and your choice of a lawyer are very important matters that should not be based on websites or advertisements.

ebaysmalllogo Image
1514095717364040 1 Image
2516492553464040 1 Image
2014 Upper Deck Team Canada Juniors Patch Auto JOHN QUENNEVILLE (46 199) #178
1514126066114040 1 Image
2013-14 Upper Deck Ultimate Ice Premieres Jacob Trouba Rookie Patch Auto #06 10
1912256774234040 1 Image
2013 KENJON BARNER Upper Deck Quantum Signature Patch Auto #'d 265 T2185
2215309086644040 1 Image
2615974459484040 1 Image
2013 Upper Deck College Mascots Manufactured Patch #CM115 The Oregon Duck
1614234641874040 1 Image
Manti Te'o 2013 Upper Deck Letterman auto 19 50
3810006760264040 1 Image
Rory McIlroy - 2014 Upper Deck Exquisite Signed Jumbo Swatch Autograp
3012897390164040 1 Image
2014 UD Upper Deck SPX George Atkinson III AUTO RC 299 Autograph
1714578114014040 1 Image
2013-14 Upper Deck Team Canada SIGNATUTRE -FELIX POTVIN- Black AUTO 5 - Leafs
« Previous1234567
 |  E-Mail | URL
Paul Lesko is a shareholder at Simmons Hanly Conroy and the chair of its Intellectual Property Department ( Don’t hold the fact that Paul is a lawyer against him, he’s also a rabid baseball and college basketball fan, and an avid baseball card collector. Paul can be found on Twitter @Paul_Lesko and Google+.

Leave a Comment: