Law of Cards: Does Panini's Filing Against Leaf Hint at Possible Resolution?

Law of Cards: Does Panini’s Filing Against Leaf Hint at Possible Resolution?

One of my favorite professions to rant against is weather forecasters. What drives me crazy about this alleged profession is when they make predictions like "100 percent chance of rain" or "no chance of rain" four days in advance -- and are then are then proven 100 percent wrong.

I'm sorry, predicting either 100 or 0 percent means that the event either will happen or will not. There is no middle ground. Don't they teach them that in weather school?

When I make my forecasts in the legal field I make sure to include wiggle room, even when I'm 100 percent confident. Take for example Leaf's LEAF LIMITED trademark filing. On July 23, the Trademark Office published LEAF LIMITED for opposition. This opened a 30-day window in which others could challenge the mark.

Given that Leaf and Panini are already engaged in many battles, including a battle over Panini's LIMITED trademark application, I predicted Panini would oppose the LEAF LIMITED mark. I even wrote:

Panini has until August 22 to start yet another Panini v. Leaf matter. Given how much these companies love suing the other, you can count on it being filed by then.

Oh wait, did I say, "you can count on it being filed by then"? Yikes! That sounds like a 100-percent prediction.

Well, apparently I was very confident about this fact on July 25.

But there was nothing to worry about. On August 22, Panini made my prediction come true by filing a request for an extension of time to oppose Leaf's trademark application.

OK, technically, Panini did not file an opposition. It filed a request for an extension to file an opposition. However, to do so, Panini did create another Panini v. Leaf matter and that's technically what I predicted.

Legal translation: I am a lawyer, proficient in the art of wiggle words and post hoc justifications. So, sue me.

But really, for a prediction made four weeks out, I think I did OK.

Panini's opposition only asked for an extension until September 21. This leaves it three possible courses of action:

1)    Panini could file an opposition,

2)    Panini could file another request for an extension of time, or

3)    Panini and Leaf could resolve the case, and it'll be dismissed.

But which will it follow?

Quite often parties file motions for extensions because they need additional time to assess the merits of the case. Trademark oppositions are complicated affairs involving multiple, amorphous factors that need to be weighed against each other to determine whether or not there's a "likelihood of consumer confusion."

Legal translation: Yes, not only does the analysis focus on "confusion," it's confusing to explain.

Because of this, it's not always easy to determine in 30 days whether or not the case can be won.

I don't think that's the case here.

Panini's LIMITED trademark application covers all usages of the mark LIMITED on (or in association with) trading cards. The existence of LEAF LIMITED defeats the purpose of Panini’s mark. Because of this, I don't think Panini needs more time to assess whether or not this is a good case for it to file.

Also, Panini only asked for 30 days. It's more customary to seek 60 days to fully assess a case. It doesn’t make sense then that Panini will file for another extension of time when it could have asked for more time in the first place and didn't.

Maybe then,and here's a difficult prediction, Panini and Leaf are in talks to wrap up not only this this case, but all their cases.

Rather than file an opposition to LEAF LIMITED, it's certainly easier and less expensive for Panini to request a 30-day extension of time to see where the talks are going, and if they go well, to obviate the need for the opposition filing.

Plus, if you're going to wrap up three to four cases, that does take a little bit of time.

Which gives rise to the next part of my prediction: Panini and Leaf will settle all of their matters by Sept. 21. In doing so, I believe the LEAF LIMITED action will disappear (likely with Leaf abandoning this application), Leaf will dismiss its oppositions against LIMITED and PRIZM, and Panini will dismiss its VALIANT/CRUSADE copyright complaint against Leaf.

This is a big prediction with a lot of moving parts and a high degree of specificity, so, to not run afoul of my rant against weather forecasters, I'm only giving this prediction a 60 percent chance of success.

The information provided in Paul Lesko's "Law of Cards" column is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues commonly encountered in the sports industry. This information is not intended to create any legal relationship between Paul Lesko, the Simmons Browder Gianaris Angelides & Barnerd LLC or any attorney and the user. Neither the transmission nor receipt of these website materials will create an attorney-client relationship between the author and the readers.

The views expressed in the "Law of Cards" column are solely those of the author and are not affiliated with the Simmons Law Firm. You should not act or rely on any information in the "Law of Cards" column without seeking the advice of an attorney. The determination of whether you need legal services and your choice of a lawyer are very important matters that should not be based on websites or advertisements.

Top eBay Listings

2012 Panini Gridiron #4 Justin Blackmon 99 Jacksonville Jaguars Auto Card 1g1

2014 Sammy Watkins Panini Elite Auto RC No. 35 Round 1 Pk 4

2014 Panini Totally Certified #158 Cody Hoffman 25 Washington Redskins Auto 0f8

2013 Panini Select #22 Archie Goodwin 49 Phoenix Suns Auto Basketball Card 1e5

2013 Panini Elite New Breed Materials Signatures NB-CZ Cody Zeller 149 Auto 0c6

2014 Panini Prizm Autographs Green Prizms #21 Kentavious Caldwell-Pope Auto 7f7

2013-14 Panini Immaculate Collection INK Gold #49 Scott Skiles 10 Auto Card 0f8

2014-15 Panini Prizm Rookie Autographs Purple Prizms 15 Gary Harris 99 Auto 0l8

2014-15 Panini Prizm Autographs Purple Pulsar Prizms 29 Otto Porter 49 Auto 2y0

2014-15 Panini Prizm Autographs Purple Pulsar Prizms #100 CJ Wilcox 49 Auto 0f8

2014-15 Panini Select Signatures Copper Prizm #S-SW Spud Webb 49 Auto Card 2v8

2014-15 Panini Select Rookie Jersey Autographs Orange Prizm 5 TJ Warren Auto 0f8

2014 Panini Select 18 Damien Inglis 60 Milwaukee Bucks Auto Basketball Card 0n7

2014 Panini Select Rookie Jersey Autographs Orange Prizm 21 James Young Auto 2h9

2014-15 Panini Select Rookie Signatures #RS-SN Shabazz Napier 275 Auto Card 2v8

2013 Panini National Treasures International #IT-TK Toni Kukoc 60 Auto Card 1j1
« Previous1234

 |  E-Mail | URL
Paul Lesko has litigated intellectual property for over 15 years. Don’t hold the fact that Paul is a lawyer against him, he’s also a rabid baseball and college basketball fan, and an avid baseball card collector. Paul can be found on Twitter @Paul_Lesko and Google+.

Sorry, comments for this entry are closed at this time.